<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email sins &#8211; how many do you commit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enquiringmimes.com/wp/2008/09/06/email-sins-how-many-do-you-commit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enquiringmimes.com/wp/2008/09/06/email-sins-how-many-do-you-commit/</link>
	<description>Tools and Technology for Adults</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://enquiringmimes.com/wp/2008/09/06/email-sins-how-many-do-you-commit/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enquiringmimes.com/wp/?p=340#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan!

With respect to BCC&#039;ing - I agree. I use BCC on almost every email I send, but I am BCC&#039;ing to me. That gives me the &#039;GMail Conversation Thread&#039; effect in Thunderbird without violating your BCC rule.

Actually, now that I think of it, my wife and I regularly BCC each other on things of mutual importance like emails to our suppliers regarding the running of our B&amp;B and the like.

But those are rather innocuous BCCs which - I think - only violate the letter of your rule and not its intent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan!</p>
<p>With respect to BCC&#8217;ing &#8211; I agree. I use BCC on almost every email I send, but I am BCC&#8217;ing to me. That gives me the &#8216;GMail Conversation Thread&#8217; effect in Thunderbird without violating your BCC rule.</p>
<p>Actually, now that I think of it, my wife and I regularly BCC each other on things of mutual importance like emails to our suppliers regarding the running of our B&amp;B and the like.</p>
<p>But those are rather innocuous BCCs which &#8211; I think &#8211; only violate the letter of your rule and not its intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

